London, July 17: Britain could look at further reductions in the number of nuclear warheads – but only if the United States and Russia make deeper cuts in their arsenals than those already announced, the government said on Thursday.
This month, the United States and Russia pledged to finalise a treaty by year-end to cut deployed nuclear warheads on each side to 1 500 – 1 675 from levels above 2 200, spurring hopes for a new wave of nuclear weapon cuts across the globe.
Washington will host a nuclear security summit in March.
“The government continues to judge, as in 2006, that a minimum nuclear deterrent remains an essential element of our national security,” Britain’s Labour administration said in a policy document aimed at influencing the Washington meeting.
“Once the strategic conditions are established that allow the US and Russia to make substantial reductions beyond those being currently negotiated of their warhead stockpiles, we believe that it is likely to be appropriate for the UK to reconsider the size of its own stockpile.”
Britain has about 160 operational warheads, a 75% cut from the Cold War era.
“As soon as it becomes useful for our arsenal to be included in broader negotiation, Britain stands ready to participate and to act,” Prime Minister Gordon Brown said in a statement.
There has been speculation that Britain could be considering scaling back or even scrapping its nuclear weapons, especially because it needs to cut spending in some areas to reduce the government’s ballooning debt burden.
The government said in 2006 it would replace its Trident submarine-launched missile programme, but last week it announced plans for its first defence review in more than a decade, which could lead to cuts in the $59bn defence budget.
Brown faces an election by mid-2010 in which opinion polls are pointing to a heavy Labour defeat, and a commitment to cut Britain’s nuclear deterrent could prove a vote winner.
A poll this week showed most British voters want to scrap nuclear weapons completely rather than replace Trident.
Brown has argued that nations like Iran, which the West suspects has nuclear arms ambitions, should have to prove they have given up such aims as a part of any wider nuclear deal.
In return, existing nuclear powers would provide civilian nuclear energy and work to reduce their own arsenals.
“We must work globally … to establish the security conditions that will enable a world free from nuclear weapons,” he said.
—-Agencies