Los Angeles: An adult film actress who said she had sex with President Donald Trump has offered to return the USD 130,000 she was paid for agreeing not to discuss the alleged relationship.
Stormy Daniels — whose real name is Stephanie Clifford — is willing to repay the money she received as part of a 2016 agreement, as long as she can speak openly about the situation, according to a copy of a letter from Clifford’s attorney obtained by The Associated Press.
The letter sent to Trump’s attorney, Michael Cohen and his attorney, Lawrence Rosen, said the non-disclosure agreement would be considered “null and void” after she returned the money, and that would allow Clifford to speak about the relationship and the attempt to silence her while she publishes any text messages, photos and videos she may have. “Mr. Cohen and the president should accept this proposal and allow Ms. Clifford to tell her side,” her attorney Michael Avenatti said. “The American people can then decide who was telling the truth.” The offer is valid until tonight, the letter said.
Right now more Americans trust a porn star than the current president of the United States. Thatβs how far the office of the presidency has fallen under Donald Trump.
— Power to the People βπ (@ProudSocialist) March 12, 2018
Consider this… Just as Trump was preparing to pay off Stormy Daniels to keep his affair with a porn star quite, he was parading Bill Clinton's accusers to the microphone in order to make it appear as if he was man of strong morals and values.
Consider that context…
— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) March 13, 2018
No shocker a porn star that won't honor an oral contract π
Yet another diversion as Trump on verge of Nobel Prize after NKorea meeting & economy on fire π₯ all cylinders https://t.co/Glcv3VP6S0— Tom Moore (@junogsp7) March 12, 2018
Cohen and Rosen did not immediately respond yesterday to requests for comment. Clifford filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles last week that sought to invalidate the agreement so she could “set the record straight.” The lawsuit claimed the “hush agreement” that was signed days before the 2016 presidential election is legally invalid because it was only signed by Clifford and Cohen and
not by Trump. It refers to Trump as David Dennison and Clifford as Peggy Peterson, but an attached exhibit details their true identities.
The Dallas Morning News reported yesterday that Texas officials are investigating whether a notary properly witnessed the non-disclosure agreement. The officials sent a letter to notary Erica Jackson notifying her that there was “good cause” to take action against her notary commission. Her stamp appears on the document but she did not sign or date it, and she did not provide a certificate of whose signature she was witnessing, officials said.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said last week that Trump has made it clear that none of the allegations are true. The White House did not respond to a request for comment yesterday.
Cohen has also denied there was ever an affair and said he paid the USD 130,000 out of his pocket. He said neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Clifford.
Porn star Stormy Daniels offers to return $130,000 payment to the President's personal lawyer to dissolve "hush agreement" about alleged Trump affair https://t.co/CaU1ZjqZP0 pic.twitter.com/epIfBIGfSd
— CNN Breaking News (@cnnbrk) March 12, 2018
https://twitter.com/SantaInc/status/973299439447154688
“Neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly,” he said. Clifford alleged in the lawsuit that Trump was aware of the negotiations. Also yesterday, the advocacy group Common Cause named Trump and Cohen in amended complaints to the Federal Election Commission and Justice Department that alleged the payment to Clifford violated campaign finance laws.
The complaints allege Cohen was an agent of then-candidate Trump and should be considered a campaign expenditure and in-kind contribution. “Emerging details appear to directly link President Trump to the hush money payments to the adult film star expanding the list of apparent violations,” said Paul S. Ryan, the group’s vice president for policy and litigation. “Hush money may be commonplace in some businesses, but when it is spent to influence a federal election it must be disclosed – without exception.
AFP