No-fishing zones may help endangered penguins

Washington: A recent study suggests that small no-fishing zones around colonies of penguins can help in conserving the struggling species.

Researchers from the Universities of Exeter and Cape Town tested bans on catching “forage fish” such as sardines and anchovies – key prey for the endangered penguins – from 20km around their breeding islands.

The body condition and survival of chicks improved when the no-fishing zones were in place.

Study author Dr. Richard Sherley from the University of Exeter’s Penryn Campus in Cornwall said, “The amount of forage fish caught worldwide is increasing and – although the effects are disputed – the impact on marine ecosystems could be severe”.

Forage fish are a key link in the food chain as they eat plankton and are preyed on by numerous species including tuna, dolphins, whales and penguins.

“We need to do more to understand the circumstances in which small no-fishing zones will improve the food available to predators, but our research shows this is a promising way to help African penguins”, Sherley added.

The test areas were on a small scale compared to some no-fishing zones worldwide, which can cover hundreds of thousands of square kilometres.

They examined colonies at Dassen Island, Robben Island, St Croix Island and Bird Island and compared fishing bans of about three years with similar periods when fishing was allowed.

They stated that overall effects was “subtle and inconsistent”, with clear benefits for penguin populations at only two of the four islands.

Dr Sherley said it was difficult to discover the full effects of the no-fishing zones because many other factors also affect the birds.

“Decades of research may be needed to be absolutely certain of the impact on the penguins’ population size,” he said.

However, the researchers used a statistical method called Bayesian inference to demonstrate beyond doubt that the zones improved the health and survival rates of penguin chicks.

Senior study author Dr Stephen Votier said, “This is an excellent example of how a collaboration between government, fisheries and scientists can lead to positive outcomes for conservation.

“Statistics have played an important role here – only by using the approach we adopted was it possible to understand fully that these fisheries closures do indeed work.”

The research appeared in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. (ANI)