Mumbai, July 11: The Maharashtra government on Saturday sacked 3,500 resident doctors on strike for the past five days and served notices seeking cancellation of their registration in postgraduate courses, officials said.
“We have initiated the necessary proceedings to terminate the registration of the doctors. It will be done through the respective colleges and universities to which they are affiliated,” Maharashtra Higher Education Minister Rajesh Tope told newsmen.
Department of Medical Education and Research Secretary Bhushan Gajrani said that all the agitating doctors will be asked to vacate their hostels and fresh advertisements will be issued to fill up the posts.
The spokesperson of the Maharashtra Association of Resident Doctors (MARD), which is leading the agitation, said that all the doctors have individually and collectively been served notices seeking cancellation of their registration around 5 p.m. by their colleges.
“However, MARD is not going to be cowed down by these pressure tactics. We have decided to continue our agitation till our long-pending demands are accepted by the State government,” said Akash Khobragade.
The developments follow a deadlock in the third round of talks between the government and MARD on Saturday.
At the meeting, Khobragade said the government offered a nominal hike of Rs.6,000 per month to the doctors, subject to approval of the State Finance Department.
The doctors rejected the proposal since it came without a proper approval, he said.
The medicos are demanding a hike in their stipend in keeping with the growing expenditure on medical education and to make it on par with other Central Government medical colleges, MARD president Jivan Rajput said.
“Resident doctors in the State get only Rs.15,000, while our counterparts in New Delhi get Rs.52,000 per month and in other States the stipend allowance is around Rs.45,000 per month,” Rajput told newsmen.
He said that under the Central Residency Scheme, all doctors have equal responsibilities, rights, status and same examinations; so there should not be any discrimination in their stipends.
—Agencies