Calling Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid issue a political problem, ICHR chief Prof Y Sudershan Rao said while it was easy to convince those connected with the mosque and the religion about evidence in favour of Ram temple, the real problem was with Leftist historians.
Stating that he had walked the streets of Ayodhya and got a feeling of living in Ramayana times, Rao said Leftist historians keep insisting that there is a need for objective evidence.
Refuting the argument that mosques were not built on existing structures, he said that there were researches suggesting that several mosques were built on land belonging to temples, including in south India.
He also said that Valmiki’s Ramayana is written mostly on objective evidence and asserted that Valmiki, in fact was a historian by himself.
Rao, who took over as the Chairperson of Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) in June last year, was speaking at a symposium organised by RSS linked Akhil Bharatiya Itihas Sankalan Yojana.
Referring to archival material on Ayodhya as showing it to be the birthplace of Lord Ram, Rao said that there were lots of such material which had assured several people.
“But is that sufficient to clinch the issue? …But if the other party is refusing to accept it. In that case, whatever evidence you make to show them, the other party is not willing to accept. Perhaps, those who are connected to the mosque and its religion, we can convince them. But our problem is with our own Leftist friends, the Leftist historians,” he said.
They want some inscriptional evidences in favour of the temple, he said.
“There is evidence related to this episode which is questioned and they (Leftist historians) simply say that these inscriptions were carried from somewhere else. How could these inscriptions sneak into a site which was closely watched and secure?” he asked.
Rao argued that the issue is not a historical problem. “If you think it is a historical problem, a number of mosques can be shown which are evidently considered to be on temples,” he said.